Blog cover image for blog article "Fischer vs Hidrex | Superior Hyperhidrosis Treatment" | Compare Fischer vs Hidrex iontophoresis devices. Learn why The Fischer offers better usability, safety, and insurance support for treating excessive sweating.

The Fischer vs. Hidrex: The Best Iontophoresis Solution for Hyperhidrosis

Comparing Fischer vs Hidrex shows The Fischer as the superior choice. With better usability, safety, and insurance coverage, it’s the smarter solution for hyperhidrosis.

Fischer vs Hidrex: A Better Way to Treat Hyperhidrosis

When choosing an iontophoresis device for hyperhidrosis treatment, comparing Fischer vs Hidrex reveals significant differences in safety, convenience, and support. While both are FDA-cleared devices, The Fischer outperforms Hidrex in key areas such as usability, electrode technology, and insurance assistance.

Fischer vs Hidrex: Key Differences

#2 Blog image of the Hidrex iontophoresis device - for blog article "Fischer vs Hidrex | Superior Hyperhidrosis Treatment" | Compare Fischer vs Hidrex iontophoresis devices. Learn why The Fischer offers better usability, safety, and insurance support for treating excessive sweating.

Hidrex

Electrode Material
Metal plates (corrode over time)

Combined Hand/Foot Treatment
Requires extra accessories

Insurance Support
No direct assistance

Warranty Coverage
Main unit only

Voltage and Current Output
Max 40V (DP450) or 60V (DVP1000); up to 35mA

Automatic Polarity Change
Not available

The Fischer

Electrode Material
Silicone-graphite (durable, no corrosion)

Combined Hand/Foot Treatment
Included with purchase

Insurance Support
Full insurance support provided

Warranty Coverage
Comprehensive, long-term coverage

Voltage and Current Output
Optimized for consistent performance

Automatic Polarity Change
Fully automatic polarity adjustments

→ Learn more about the Fischer

The Fischer’s Advanced Silicone-Graphite Electrodes

The Fischer uses state-of-the-art silicone-graphite electrodes, which are:
  • Durable: Never corrode, ensuring consistent performance over time.
  • Safe: Metal-free, making them ideal for patients with metal allergies.
  • Effective: Cover 33% more surface area than traditional electrodes, providing superior results.
Additionally, The Fischer includes all necessary accessories for simultaneous hand and foot treatments, unlike Hidrex, which requires additional purchases.
Fischer vs Hidrex

Usability: Why The Fischer Outshines Hidrex

The Problem with Hidrex’s Metal Electrodes

Hidrex devices rely on traditional metal electrodes, which corrode with use, requiring frequent cleaning or replacement. According to Hidrex’s website:

"It is normal for at least one of the electrodes to become discolored after just a couple of uses. Typically, the black electrode (the negative side) gets discolored faster or more."



This corrosion not only reduces treatment effectiveness but may release metal ions into the water, potentially causing skin irritation or allergic reactions.
Graphic image comparing the metal electrodes of Hidrex compared to the silicone-graphite electrodes of The Fischer iontophoresis device.
Fischer vs Hidrex

Insurance Support: The Fischer Makes It Easy

Hidrex: Limited Assistance

Hidrex devices do not work directly with insurance providers, leaving patients to navigate the reimbursement process on their own.

The Fischer: Comprehensive Insurance Assistance

RA Fischer Co. has a proven track record of helping patients secure insurance coverage. Our Treatment Specialists handle eligibility checks, paperwork, and approvals, often resulting in patients receiving The Fischer at no out-of-pocket cost.
Fischer vs Hidrex

Why The Fischer is Safer Than Hidrex

Hidrex’s Safety Concerns
Metal electrodes corrode, potentially releasing harmful ions into the skin. Lacks automatic polarity changes, increasing the risk of skin irritation.

The Fischer’s Superior Safety Features Non-metallic electrodes eliminate the risk of corrosion and skin irritation. Automatic polarity adjustments ensure a safe, comfortable treatment experience.
Fischer vs Hidrex

Fischer vs Hidrex: Usability and Convenience

Hidrex’s Shortcomings in Usability
  • No automatic polarity change requires manual adjustments, which can be inconvenient.
  • Combined hand/foot treatment requires additional accessories, adding to costs.

The Fischer’s User-Friendly Features
  • Fully automatic polarity adjustments eliminate hassle.
  • Includes all necessary components for simultaneous hand and foot treatments.
  • Painless, at-home treatments take just 15–20 minutes, making it an easy addition to your routine.
Fischer vs Hidrex

Why Choose The Fischer Over Hidrex?

Advanced Technology
From automatic polarity changes to durable, corrosion-free electrodes, The Fischer incorporates the latest advancements for safer, more effective treatments.

Comprehensive Support
Unlike Hidrex, RA Fischer Co. works closely with insurance providers, ensuring patients have access to affordable treatment.

Superior Usability
With user-friendly features and all-inclusive accessories, The Fischer offers a seamless experience for hyperhidrosis management.
"Why settle for corroding electrodes? The Fischer’s silicone-graphite technology ensures long-lasting, effective results."
Hyperhidrosis treatments

Take Control with The Fischer Today

When comparing Fischer vs Hidrex, The Fischer Iontophoresis Device emerges as the superior choice. With safer technology, greater usability, and full insurance support, it’s the smarter solution for managing hyperhidrosis. Contact our Treatment Specialists today to learn more and check your insurance coverage!

THE FISCHER

Reach out today

Contact one of our Treatment Specialists today to answer any and all of your questions about the Fischer. 

Legal Disclaimer:

Hidrex® is a registered trademark of Hidrex GmbH. This comparison is based on publicly available information and is intended to inform individuals about their hyperhidrosis treatment options. RA Fischer Co. provides this information to help patients make informed decisions about managing their condition. The Fischer is a product of RA Fischer Co.

hyperhidrosis treatment

FAQs About Fischer vs Hidrex

The Fischer uses silicone-graphite electrodes, eliminating the corrosion and metal ion risks associated with Hidrex’s metal plates.

Yes, The Fischer includes automatic polarity adjustments and all necessary accessories for simultaneous hand and foot treatments.

Absolutely. The Fischer comes with everything needed for combined hand and foot treatments, unlike Hidrex, which requires additional purchases.

RA Fischer Co. works directly with insurance providers, often securing full coverage for patients, while Hidrex does not offer insurance assistance.

Hidrex lacks automatic polarity changes, requiring manual adjustments. The Fischer’s automatic polarity adjustment ensures even and effective treatment.

Leave a Reply