January 15, 2024

The Fischer vs. Dermadry

Comparing The Fischer vs Dermadry shows The Fischer as the superior choice. With better electrodes, adjustable settings, and insurance support, it’s the smarter solution.

Fischer vs Dermadry: A Comparison of Hyperhidrosis Solutions

When managing hyperhidrosis, choosing the right iontophoresis device is important. Comparing The Fischer vs Dermadry, key differences in usability, durability, and patient comfort clearly set The Fischer Iontophoresis Device apart.

While both devices are FDA-cleared, Dermadry’s limitations—such as discomfort during polarity changes, smaller treatment components, and consumable parts—highlight why The Fischer is the smarter, more effective choice for managing hyperhidrosis.

Fischer vs Dermadry: Key Differences

FISCHER VS DERMADRY

Why The Fischer Offers a Better Polarity Change Experience

Discomfort with Dermadry’s Polarity Changes
Dermadry’s device manual includes this note:
"Slight pain could be felt at the beginning of the treatment or after the polarity alternating sequence."

Patients frequently report experiencing small electric shocks during polarity changes. This is particularly uncomfortable in sensitive areas like the underarms, where shocks can be even more noticeable. Unfortunately, these shocks occur multiple times during a session and cannot be turned off.

The Fischer’s Smooth Polarity Changes

The Fischer eliminates these discomforts entirely with its advanced polarity change feature. From our experience, we’ve ensured that polarity adjustments are seamless and irritation-free for the patient, offering a much more comfortable iontophoresis session.

FISCHER VS DERMADRY

Fischer vs Dermadry: Usability, Durability, and Convenience

Customizable Treatment Levels vs Predefined Settings

Dermadry limits users to preset mA levels (25, 15, and 8 mA), restricting personalization. This one-size-fits-all approach can be uncomfortable or ineffective for many patients.

In contrast, The Fischer allows users to adjust mA levels up to 30 mA, tailoring treatment intensity for optimal comfort and results.

Direct Current and Pulsed Current Options

Dermadry only supports pulsed current, which is less effective for many hyperhidrosis patients.
According to Dr. Rolf Eilers: "Direct Current is the most effective way to treat hyperhidrosis... Pulsed Current may be suitable for sensitive patients, but it’s always less effective."

The Fischer provides both direct and pulsed current options, offering flexibility while ensuring maximum effectiveness for all users.

Metal-Free Electrodes

The Fischer was the first iontophoresis device that revolutionized the way iontophoresis could treat hyperhidrosis with our silicon-graphite electrodes. Patients no longer need to worry about metal allergies or contaminant buildup on metal electrodes.

Since its introduction in 2020, The Fischer has inspired other companies to integrate similar features into their designs. The latest version of the Dermadry machine, for instance, now includes silicone electrodes. However, the quality of these electrodes varies from the original design of The Fischer.

Unlike The Fischer’s sturdy silicon-graphite electrodes, the Dermadry machine features thin electrodes with a grid pattern. This can result in reduced treatment efficiency and an increase in the chance of shock or burn.

Durable Components

Dermadry’s instructions for use state:

"The mats, pockets and electrodes are consumables and are not included in the product warranty."
"Recommended duration of use under normal conditions for mats and electrodes: 5 years, for underarm pockets 30 treatments."

The Fischer’s Advantages
While Dermadry classifies its mats, electrodes, and sponge pockets as consumable parts that may require replacement, The Fischer is designed for long-term use without the need for frequent replacements.

fischer vs dermadry

Insurance Coverage

The Fischer Iontophoresis Device from RA Fischer Co. is often covered by insurance, making it a more affordable option for hyperhidrosis treatment. RA Fischer Co. works directly with many insurance providers, including Tricare, Aetna, and United, to secure coverage for patients. Our dedicated Treatment Specialists handle eligibility checks and guide patients through the reimbursement process, ensuring seamless support every step of the way.

In contrast, Dermadry, as a Canadian company, offers no insurance assistance, leaving patients to pay out-of-pocket. This makes The Fischer the more accessible and cost-effective choice for hyperhidrosis treatment.

Check Insurance Coverage

When comparing Fischer vs Dermadry, the choice is clear—The Fischer provides better durability, usability, and patient comfort.

fischer vs dermadry

Take Control of Hyperhidrosis with The Fischer

When comparing Fischer vs Dermadry, The Fischer Iontophoresis Device stands out as the superior choice. Offering smoother polarity changes, better durability, and comprehensive insurance support, it’s the smarter solution for managing hyperhidrosis. Contact our Treatment Specialists today to learn more and check your insurance coverage!

THE FISCHER

Reach out today

Contact one of our Treatment Specialists today to answer any and all of your questions about the Fischer.

Legal Disclaimer: Qbrexza® is a registered trademark of Dermira, Inc. This comparison is based on publicly available information and is intended to inform individuals about their hyperhidrosis treatment options. RA Fischer Co. provides this information to help patients make informed decisions about managing their condition. The Fischer is a product of RA Fischer Co.

Hyperhidrosis Treatment

FAQs About Fischer vs Dermadry

Does Dermadry’s polarity change cause discomfort?

Dermadry’s device manual notes that small shocks may be felt during polarity changes, leading to discomfort during treatment.

How does The Fischer handle polarity changes?

The Fischer ensures smooth polarity changes without any irritation, providing a comfortable experience for all patients.

Explore the Fischer

Is The Fischer more durable than Dermadry?

The Fischer’s silicone-graphite electrodes and ergonomic components are built to last, while Dermadry’s consumable parts have limited lifespans.