Blog cover image for blog article "The Fischer Iontophoresis Device vs. ETS Surgery: The Safer Solution for Hyperhidrosis" | Compare Fischer Iontophoresis vs ETS Surgery. Discover why this FDA-cleared device is a safe, effective alternative for managing hyperhidrosis without surgery risks.

The Fischer Iontophoresis Device vs. ETS Surgery: The Safer Solution for Hyperhidrosis

Comparing Fischer Iontophoresis vs ETS Surgery shows a clear winner. The Fischer offers safe, non-invasive hyperhidrosis treatment without the risks of surgery.

Fischer Iontophoresis vs ETS Surgery: A Better Option for Hyperhidrosis Treatment

Hyperhidrosis can feel overwhelming, especially when considering treatment options. Comparing Fischer Iontophoresis vs ETS Surgery, it’s clear that The Fischer provides a safer, non-invasive, and more convenient solution for managing excessive sweating.

While ETS (Endoscopic Thoracic Sympathectomy) surgery requires invasive procedures and carries risks like compensatory sweating, The Fischer Iontophoresis Device offers effective treatment in the comfort of your own home—without life-altering side effects.

The Drawbacks of ETS Surgery

Compensatory Sweating After ETS Surgery

One of the most significant drawbacks of ETS surgery is compensatory sweating—where sweating shifts to new areas, such as the chest, back, or thighs.

Key Study: Research from Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark revealed that 90% of patients who underwent ETS for underarm sweating experienced compensatory sweating. Shockingly, 50% of these individuals found the side effects severe enough to require multiple clothing changes daily.

In contrast, The Fischer Iontophoresis Device treats excessive sweating in the hands, feet, and underarms without triggering compensatory sweating or other significant side effects.
Fischer Iontophoresis vs ETS Surgery

Lifestyle Impacts of ETS Surgery

ETS surgery doesn’t just impact sweating—it can lead to long-term changes in bodily functions, such as: Patients like Randy Choi, co-founder of Thompson Tee, report side effects such as slowed metabolism, skin issues, and psychological fatigue after ETS surgery.

How The Fischer Iontophoresis Device Works

The Fischer Iontophoresis Device uses a gentle electrical current to push minerals like calcium and magnesium from tap water into the sweat glands, essentially “plugging” them to reduce sweating. Unlike ETS surgery, this non-invasive treatment ensures:
  • No hospital visits or surgical risks.
  • No downtime—treatments take just 15–20 minutes, 2–3 times a week.
  • Long-lasting results without irreversible changes to your body.
Fischer Iontophoresis vs ETS Surgery

Fischer Iontophoresis vs ETS Surgery: A Side-by-Side Comparison

Surgeons in green scrubs performing Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy (ETS) surgery in an operating room

ETS Surgery

  • Invasive, with significant risks
  • Compensatory sweating, slowed metabolism, and more
  • Requires surgery and recovery time
  • Effective at stopping sweat in some areas, but with severe trade-offs
  • Expensive and rarely fully covered by insurance

A picture captures RA Fischer Co.'s "The Fischer" placed on a level surface, connected to two water bath trays containing blue pH-balancing foam. The backdrop is a simple white.

The Fischer Iontophoresis Device

  • Non-invasive and FDA-cleared
  • Minimal side effects, no compensatory sweating
  • At-home treatments
  • 98% success rate without side effects
  • Covered by many insurance plans

Fischer Iontophoresis vs ETS Surgery

Insurance Coverage: Why The Fischer Is More Accessible

ETS surgery is costly and often not fully covered by insurance, leaving patients with significant out-of-pocket expenses. On the other hand, The Fischer Iontophoresis Device is frequently covered by insurance as a medically necessary treatment for hyperhidrosis.
Fischer Iontophoresis vs ETS Surgery

Fischer Iontophoresis vs ETS Surgery: Choose the Safer Path

Avoid Risks, Embrace Results

The Fischer Iontophoresis Device provides a 98% success rate for treating excessive sweating, without the risks or lifestyle disruptions associated with ETS surgery. Whether you’re managing hyperhidrosis in your hands, feet, or underarms, The Fischer offers a reliable, cost-effective solution.

Dedicated Support

Every Fischer device user has access to personalized guidance, ensuring that you have everything you need to succeed with your treatment.
The Fischer eliminates the need for drastic measures like ETS surgery, giving you control without the complications.
Fischer Iontophoresis vs ETS Surgery

Take Control with The Fischer Today

When comparing Fischer Iontophoresis vs ETS Surgery, the choice is clear. The Fischer offers a safe, non-invasive solution for hyperhidrosis management, delivering proven results without the risks of surgery. Take the first step toward lasting dryness and confidence—contact our Treatment Specialists today!

THE FISCHER

Reach out today

Contact one of our Treatment Specialists today to answer any and all of your questions about the Fischer. 

Hyperhidrosis and School Nurses

FAQs: Everything You Need to Know About Hyperhidrosis in Schools

Encourage students to thrive by recognizing and addressing hyperhidrosis—one step at a time!

Compensatory sweating is a common side effect of ETS surgery, where sweating shifts to other body areas. The Fischer Iontophoresis Device treats excessive sweating without triggering compensatory sweating.

ETS surgery is often expensive, with limited insurance coverage. The Fischer is a one-time investment, frequently covered by insurance, and comes with a 4-year warranty.

The Fischer has a 98% success rate in reducing sweating without the side effects associated with ETS surgery.

Yes, The Fischer effectively treats sweating in the hands, feet, and underarms, which are also target areas for ETS surgery.

Yes, The Fischer is FDA-cleared, non-invasive, and designed for safe, effective at-home treatments.

Leave a Reply